![]() ![]() ![]() Despite the low potencies of these compounds in antioxidant targets, they can be considered as supplementary targets in Alzheimer and inflammation. Similarly, both compounds were less potent in ABTS and DPPH targets with IC 50 values in the range of 185.83–369.86 μg/mL. Similarly, the IC 50 values of compound 2 against the same targets were 14.51, 10.65, 8.45, 109.40 and 8.71 μg/mL. Compound 1 exhibited the IC 50 values of 20.29, 27.35, 10.70, 80.10 and 7.40 μg/mL against acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, COX-2, COX-1 and 5-LOX, respectively. Both compounds were evaluated for anticholinesterase, COX/LOX inhibitions and antioxidant assays. Compound 1 was observed to be 4,22-cholestadien-3-one, while compound 2 was identified as stigmast-4-en-3-one. Further, the NMR analysis was also used to supplement the structural evidence. The structures of both compounds ( 1 and 2) were accurately confirmed with GC-MS analysis by comparison of the fragmentation pattern within the library of the instrument. Using the conventional gravity column chromatography followed by small analytical column purification, two major components were isolated from the plant materials. Based on the pharmacological importance of different species of fragaria, this research was carried out for the isolation of bioactive compounds from Fragaria × ananassa. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |